Effect of Advance Care Planning on Heart Failure Patients
Keywords:
Advance Care Planning, Heart Failure, End-of-Life Care, Patient-Provider Communication, Clinician Barriers, Quality of LifeAbstract
Introduction
Advance Care Planning (ACP) is crucial for aligning medical care with patient values in heart failure, a progressive, life-limiting illness. Despite its recognized importance, the implementation of ACP is complex and faces significant barriers from both patients and clinicians, impacting the quality of end-of-life care.
Methods
This abstract is based on a literature review that synthesizes findings from systematic reviews, qualitative studies, and clinical protocols. The review examined patient and clinician experiences with ACP, barriers to its implementation, and its efficacy in the heart failure population.
Results
The literature defines ACP as an evolving communication process rather than a static, one-time event. Patients often express ambivalence towards ACP but largely expect clinicians to initiate these crucial discussions. However, clinicians face significant barriers, including a lack of disease-specific knowledge and emotional challenges, which contribute to low engagement rates. While ACP has been shown to improve patient-physician communication, evidence for its effectiveness on other patient outcomes remains inconsistent across studies.
Discussion
A significant gap exists between the perceived importance of ACP and its actual practice, driven by patient emotional hurdles and substantial clinician-side barriers. A dual approach that empowers patients while providing clinicians with targeted training and structured support is necessary to bridge this gap. The variability in outcomes highlights the need for standardized yet flexible ACP models that can be tailored to individual patient readiness and disease stage.
Conclusion
ACP is a vital component of high-quality care for heart failure patients, but its implementation is hindered by well-documented barriers. A multifaceted strategy incorporating clinician training, structured protocols, and patient empowerment is essential to integrate ACP effectively into routine practice and ensure patient preferences are honored.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 L.Peterson, L.Clower (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
